New Hearing Needed to Resolve Boundary Dispute

It is often thought that an appeal to the Court of Appeal will lead to the resolution of a dispute, but in some cases, the Court will merely decide that another hearing is necessary.

In a recent case, the Court heard an appeal concerning a boundary dispute involving land in the Isle of Wight countryside. In simple terms, the question at issue was whether the line of a hedge (which had subsequently been replaced by a fence) or a ditch (which ran part of the way between the properties) represented the true boundary.

The Recorder hearing the case had declined to give consideration to a 1915 deed containing a plan. He concluded that the ditch marked the boundary, even though it was dug after the hedge was created. A further issue regarding adverse possession (‘squatters’ rights’) had not been considered by the Recorder and the result was an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

In the circumstances, the Court made no decision but remitted the case for a new trial so that all the relevant factors could be considered.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Speak to our Wills & Probate experts directly on:

0333 344 4775

or complete your details below and one of our experts will contact you:

* Before your form can be submitted please type the characters shown here into the box below


*Initial advice limited to 30 minutes